Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size
Download scientific diagram | Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size (OS) measured across transverse sections and (B) scale size (SS) measured from the focus to the anterior edge. Regression lines depict linear (dashed lines) and logarithmic fits (solid lines). For A, linear: OS = 1.89 + 0.09 · FL, r 2 = 0.94; log: OS = 3.29 · log e FL – 6.32, r 2 = 0.95. For B, linear: SS = –0.12 + 0.07 · FL, r 2 = 0.88; log: SS = 2.38 · log e FL – 6.07, r 2 = 0.89. from publication: Longitudinal Length Back-Calculations from Otoliths and Scales Differ Systematically in Haddock | Parallel macrostructure analysis of otoliths versus scales was conducted on Georges Bank Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus sampled in spring 2011 to test whether annuli widths of both structures yield comparable estimates of back-calculated length at age. While generally | Otolith, Otolithic Membrane and Fish | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.
SEFIS – NOAA Teacher at Sea Blog
Sebastes diploproa hi-res stock photography and images - Alamy
Decoupling of otolith and somatic growth during anadromous
Larger fork hi-res stock photography and images - Page 2 - Alamy
Otolith fingerprints of the coral reef fish Stegastes fuscus in
otoliths – NOAA Teacher at Sea Blog
Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size
Comparison of the performance of scale and otolith microchemistry
Forklift Fork Dimensions and Types
Schematic thin section of a plaice otolith with indication of the
PDF] Using bone measurements to estimate the original sizes of
Claudia GÜNTHER, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, CAU, Forschungs- und Technologiezentrum Westküste (FTZ)
Otolith morphometry and Fourier transform near-infrared (FT-NIR