M10 Booker Tank is the Wrong Weapon for the Wrong War

The M10 Booker represents the U.S. Army's latest venture into mechanized warfare, occupying a unique niche between traditional tanks and armored personnel carriers. This "non-tank-tank," distinguished by its 105mm cannon and lighter armor compared to the M1 Abrams, aims to enhance firepower and maneuverability within mechanized brigades.

Ten Responses to the MPF Discussion

The U.S. Navy Might Not Have Enough Aircraft Carriers

Light tank MPF received the designation and went into series

US Army's MPF Is Now The M10 Booker, Page 3

Electric tanks, and Donald Trump lies hmm .. maybe?

Beneath the Waves: The Only Underwater Submarine Battle in History

People said the M10 Booker is big for a light tank, yet this seems plenty small : r/TankPorn

What If France Fought On? Exploring an Alternate World War II

Battleship Tirpitz Was 53,000 Tons of Raw Naval Power

US M10 Booker, Indian Project Zorawar, Chinese Type 15: Renewed focus on Light tanks? – Battle Machines

Army The National Interest

M8 Armored Gun System - Wikiwand

The Army's M10 Booker is a tank. Prove us wrong.

M10 Booker: The Micro Abrams - Passed - War Thunder — official forum