Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

JCDD, Free Full-Text

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

Clinical experience with a novel large bore vascular closure device after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Dry Field Closure of Large-Bore Access With Iliac Artery

Dual Suture Versus Suture and Plug Closure Devices for Large Bore

Sebastian SADONI, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, München, LMU, Clinic of Cardiac Surgery

The novel echo‐guided ProGlide technique during percutaneous

Stephan Heo, MD (@StephanHeo) / X

An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in

vascular closure devices II.pptx

Perclose Proglide™ for vascular closure

Perclose Proglide™ for vascular closure

Alberto P. on LinkedIn: Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis…